Jewish, Jewish, Everywhere, & not a drop to drink
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
When a kiss is not (just) a kiss, it gets the Israeli justice minister fired and sentenced and...
Three-judge panel delivers unanimous verdict
Former justice minister Haim Ramon found guilty in indecent behavior trial
By Mazal Mualem and Nir Hasson, Haaretz Correspondents, Haaretz Service and Agencies
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/819881.html
Wed., January 31, 2007 Shvat 12, 5767
Former justice minister Haim Ramon was found guilty of indecent behavior at Tel Aviv Magistrate's Court on Wednesday afternoon, for having kissed a young woman soldier against her will. The three-judge panel delivered a unanimous verdict.
"The complainant's account is the absolute truth," wrote judges Hayuta Kochan, Daniela Cherizli and Daniel Beeri. "Ramon, however, did not stick to the truth, exaggerated the part played by the complainant and distorted the facts in a sophisticated and savvy way."
They said that, "The version that he presented did not stand up to the tests of reason and common sense, nor were they supported by evidence."
"There are some lines that cannot be crossed," said Kochan, who read out the verdict. "This was not a kiss of affection. This has all the elements of sexual crime."
Ramon came under heavy criticism from the judges, who wrote that his behavior was not "an honest mistake, rather indifference to the wishes of the complainant." The reliability of his accuser, however, "was never in question."
The judges said that Ramon "tried to distance himself from the event and from anything that could have embroiled him" in the affair. "He had no qualms about slandering the complainant... The defense produced witnesses whose sole target was to blacken the complainant's name."
The panel expressed the hope that the trial and the accusations hurled against the complainant would not discourage other victims of sexual crimes from coming forward.
Ramon, who could face up to three years in prison, left the courthouse without commenting to reporters. He is expected to appeal. The hearing on his sentencing will take place on February 21, Channel 2 television said.
Ramon was charged last August with indecent behavior for having kissed H., the complainant, on July 12, the day the second Lebanon war began.
Journalists were prevented from taking cell phones and beepers into the courtroom. Instead, a court spokesman emerged to announce the verdict to the waiting press.
Both sides agreed that H., who was finishing her army service, asked to be photographed hugging Ramon. According to the indictment, she then tried to leave, but "the defendant continued to embrace her body with one hand and drew her near. With the other hand, he grasped her cheeks, turned her face toward him and pressed his lips to her lips, while inserting his tongue into her mouth, all without her consent."
Ramon admitted to the kiss, but claimed that it was the natural outcome of a lengthy flirtation that H. conducted with him. He also claimed that the kiss was mutual, not something he forced upon the complainant.
The prosecution had argued that the two had no prior acquaintance and that nothing in H.'s behavior implied that she wanted Ramon to kiss her. It also claimed that a kiss between a young woman and a 56-year-old minister, minutes before a cabinet vote to go to war, is normatively problematic.
During the trial, there was a factual disagreement over when the kiss occurred: H. claimed that it happened immediately after the photograph, before they left the room, while Ramon said that it took place a few minutes later, after the two had left the room and then returned to it. The judges will have to decide on this issue.
The most important question facing the judges, however, was whether Ramon could or should have known that H. did not want to be kissed. The prosecution claimed that Ramon never even asked himself what she wanted.
Ramon argued that the conversation that preceded the photograph and the hug that H. gave him during the photograph led him to believe that she wanted him to kiss her, and therefore, the kiss was not a crime.
Labels: Israel, politics, sexual harrasment
Sunday, January 28, 2007
Carlebach tried to wake the sleeping Jewish masses with his music
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZ-yOSr1l9Q
Labels: Jewish music, singing rabbi, song
Israelis battle Judaism in schools
State schools introduce religious studies despite gov't opposition
By Or Kashti, Haaretz Correspondent
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/818065.html
Sun., January 28, 2007 Shvat 9, 5767
Schools in Givatayim and Petah Tikva have introduced a new religious studies program to "strengthen Jewish identity," although the Education Ministry deemed it unfit for state schools. The ministry intends to issue instructions to these schools to stop operating the program.
The program is financed by ultra-Orthodox tycoon Lev Leviev and taught by religious and Haredi female students. It emphasizes the importance of prayers and Jewish history from a halakhic perspective.
The program is taught in 18 schools, 17 in Petah Tikva and one in Givatayim, usually in first to sixth grades for two hours a week. It is considered the flagship of the Leviev Foundation for Education and Jewish Identity, which was founded by Leviev and his wife Olga.
The work book accompanying the program's classes says it "contributes to expanding the pupils' knowledge and provides them with universal values deriving from Jewish heritage and culture." However, Anat Zohar, the chairwoman of the Education Ministry's Pedagogic Secretariat, issued a special statement saying the program "is not at all suitable for state schools. On the one hand, it lacks a pluralistic worldview reflecting that of the pupils, most of whom come from secular homes... on the other hand, it emphasizes numerous halakhic and religious issues."
For example, the book instructs children to say morning prayers daily and wash their hands, and claims the prayer is capable of warding off evil and obtaining God's love.
"These points of view constitute preaching and could create conflicts between the worldview the child is taught at home and that of the studies in school," wrote Zohar. "In summary, my professional opinion is that the program is not suitable for teaching and learning in state schools."
The program's book for second grade teaches that it is important to love "every Jew" because "we're all one nation and God loves the fact that we're together."
The pupils are taught that the Temple Menorah "was very holy" and that "as long as the Israeli nation carried out God's will, the Menorah's western candle did not go out but continued burning in a wonderful holy light!"
Parents of pupils studying at Alon school in Givatayim are not pleased with the religious studies program.
"I sent my children to a secular school, not to a Leviev or Shas school," one mother said. "That program was introduced without our knowledge. It's proselytizing. In a state school I know more or less what they teach. If it's so important to expand Jewish studies, let them do it with an Education Ministry program, not Leviev's."
"Every time someone with money comes along [to the education system], they start teaching something he wants, at the expense of the already dwindling study hours," a father said.
He said that in the previous year the school had introduced Shari Arison's program "The essence of life," which had also not been authorized by the Education Ministry.
Education Ministry officials said only the ministry may authorize study programs and that, in any case, such programs must be taught in addition to the official studies, not at their expense.
of Judaism_Section (PALTALK)
